Yeah, it does make the game harder. However, I would rather have silence than a little kid or faulty mic be in every other game. There is probably a large number of circumstances that lead to hardly anyone using mics.I find teamwork incredibly hard when nobody uses mic's anymore how about anyone else.
I find teamwork incredibly hard when nobody uses mic's anymore how about anyone else.
Depends what you consider are kids ages. I think anything below 11 years of age is too young to be on XBL.
I will not let my child watch violent movies no more than violent games or be on XBL. Every kid is different obviously, but I would say the age of 10-12 is a good time to begin an exposure to that type of media, else they will evetnually see it somewhere else and outside of your knowledge and potential guidance.
On the subject of kids and video games, I find it a bit hypocritical that no one has a problem with kids watching violent movies anymore, but video games are a gigantic problem. I think it's up to parents to decide what their kids play. If little Timmy gets his fragile mind warped by a violent video game, is that the industries fault? No. It's poor parenting. The games have ratings for a reason.
I can't even play CoD and I'm 15, and my parents (dad especialy) are very carefull about what we watch and play sometimes a bit over protectiv, but I don't have a problem with it, altough in school there are some things I can't relate to cause for exemple: I didn't see Alien when I was 7 and everyone else did... But even as a "kid" I agree with you, in most of your points.
Well there is an obvious difference between video games. I do not consider Halo graphically violent. I have no problem letting a 6-7+ year old play that. I do not let them on XBL without me due to exposure to mature concepts and language. But I would also assert that boys playing Halo matchmaking at 7 and boys hitting eachother with sticks in the backyard at 7 are fairly equal. Both teach some basic combat and mental skills that are essential to male development, IMO:
-Strategy
-Problem Solving
-Respect
-Comprehension of defeat
-Cause and effect
-Teamwork
The list could go on, but I hope that makes the point. Also, these are all things a father could and should (IMO) teach if he is present and able to do so. If a child (boy inparticular) encounters challenges to the things above, a father's guidance, experience, and example for him to follow to those understandings is greater than all the wealth of a lifetime.
Okay, off rant. lolz
Yes this is all true but don't forget that a lack of restriction will teach the child that violence is good and or fun and that can lead to some major problems. I have seen both, over protected and under protected and both can be bad. The key to this all is a balance as is almost all things in life.Agreed. The worst thing you can do is ban them from it without educating them about it. Otherwise, suddenly Johnny gets bullied at school and thinks his dads hidden hand gun will solve the problem. Shunning something is only a temporary band aid. Educating will last forever.